Stephen Leahy, International Environmental Journalist

Discovering Global Environmental Interconnections

Nuclear for the Poor, Renewables for the Rich?

with 2 comments

By Stephen Leahy

VIENNA, Jun 27, 2011 (IPS)

In a debate about the future of energy, the global south wants to spend tens of billions of dollars on nuclear plants while the global north looks to spend hundreds of millions on decentralised, renewable energy.

At least those were the positions taken by representatives during the BBC TV’s World Debate programme filmed at the 2011 Vienna Energy Forum.

“We must have nuclear energy if India is to develop,” said Srikumar Banerjee, the chair of India’s Atomic Energy Commission.

via Nuclear for the Poor, Renewables for the Rich? – IPS ipsnews.net.

Written by Stephen

27/06/2011 at 5:42 pm

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. As long as you keep messing around with wind, solar, geothermal and wave power, the coal industry is safe. There is no way wind, solar, geothermal and wave power can replace coal, and they know it.
    If you quit being afraid of nuclear, the coal industry is doomed. Every time you argue in favor of wind, solar, geothermal and wave power, or against nuclear, King Coal is happy. ONLY nuclear power can put coal out of business. Nuclear power HAS put coal out of business in France. France uses 30 year old American technology. So here is the deal: Keep being afraid of all things nuclear and die either when [not if] civilization collapses or when H2S comes out of the ocean and Homo “Sapiens” goes extinct. OR: Get over your paranoia and kick the coal habit and live. Which do you choose? I put quotation marks around “Sapiens” because it is not clear that most “people” have enough brains to avoid extinction when it is clearly predicted and the safe path has been pointed out. Nuclear is the safe path and we have factory built nuclear power plants now.

    Asteroid Miner

    27/06/2011 at 10:40 pm

  2. Miner, I think you should read the article before commenting. Much of the objection to nuclear is the fact it is extremely costly as I have documented in these articles.

    Nuclear Power Costs Skyrocket, Cost of Renewables Plummet
    http://stephenleahy.net/2011/03/12/nuclear-power-costs-skyrocket-cost-of-renewables-plummet/

    Limited Liability – Nuclear Energy’s ‘Mother of all Subsidies’ http://stephenleahy.net/2011/05/18/limited-liability-nuclear-energys-mother-of-all-subsidies/

    And you should also read this detailed analysis of renewables as baseload: http://www.skepticalscience.com/detailed-look-at-renewable-baseload-energy.html

    Stephen

    28/06/2011 at 2:36 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,600 other followers

%d bloggers like this: