Stephen Leahy, International Environmental Journalist

Discovering Global Environmental Interconnections

CONTACT STEPHEN

with 6 comments

Please fill out the form below – it helps reduce spam and you will receive a reply, usually within 24 hours.





Written by Stephen

20/04/2010 at 10:21 am

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Hi Stephen,

    I came across your interesting website via http://climatechangemedia.ning.com/
    I thought you might be interested in wiring a report on Norway’s CCS efforts within R&D, testing and real carbon capture projects.
    Technology Centre Mongstad is the world’s largest facility for testing and improving CO2 capture. Knowledge gained will prepare the ground for CO2 capture initiatives to combat climate change. TCM is a joint venture between the Norwegian state, Statoil, Shell and Sasol.

    Please see our website, and feel free to contact me.

    Best regards,
    Vegar

    Vegar Stokset

    06/10/2010 at 6:49 am

    Reply

  2. Hi Stephen,

    I am a University student in my first year of a Geography degree and I’ve been researching what it could lead on to. Today I discovered Environmental Journalism and, after looking at what it involves, I’m really interested in doing this job. I just wondered if you had any advice/tips on how to get into this career? I’d really appreciate it.
    Good luck with your work!
    Kind regards
    Jess

    Jess

    23/01/2011 at 9:37 am

    Reply

  3. $25,000 for the proof CO2 causes climate change.

    Bruce A. Kershaw

    23/03/2012 at 5:37 pm

    Reply

    • not much point – you wouldn’t accept any evidence … and it doesn’t matter what you think.

      Stephen

      23/03/2012 at 8:50 pm

      Reply

      • Evidence is not proof, Temp. charts are not proof, a hypothesis is not proof.

        Proof is a test or experiment.

        To prove a Hypothesis, to form a consensus, you need a test.

        There is no test of any kind to form a consensus, to disprove 177 years of CO2 chemistry,

        that is excluded from the climate study, and is way the climate study is flawed.

        Bruce A. Kershaw

        26/03/2012 at 2:49 pm

      • “Evidence is not proof”??? Bruce you are firmly in denial.

        Stephen

        28/03/2012 at 8:33 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,600 other followers

%d bloggers like this: